The Photographer’s Edit

To Photoshop or Not to Photoshop – that is the Question!

Editing photographic images is a rather contentious issue. I think many believe that an image is and should be true to what the photographer saw – it is after all a moment of time captured for eternity. Yet many of us, myself included, edit to some degree and some much more than others.

The Edit

The above images are by the very talented Gregory Sweeney at Africa Wild Safaris. He talks us through his process and how he makes the subtle changes required to really bring out the “wow” factor in his photography. I personally like his approach, I think its authentic and genuine.

I guess I could be called a gentle editor, I believe it’s very important to get as much right in camera rather than rely on a clever edit when it comes to post production work.

I like to remove distracting items such as rogue leaves or (sadly) the odd bit of rubbish.

But many of my peers in all genres of photography edit extensively,  effectively creating a totally new image from the raw data they have captured.

Below is a famous image of Madonna  – before and after numerous photoshop edits.

She’s virtually unrecognisable!  And as the article,  attached to this image, eludes  – photoshop has had a strong influence on women and how they think they should look.

Right or Wrong?

Is this wrong? – no of course not, it’s art in its very own right and incredibly skilled art at that. The bit that’s wrong for me though is when you, the audience, believe it to be something it isn’t and when the “art” influences societies perception of how a person should look

When you believe it to be true to what the photographer saw and true to what that particular animal or person looked like, its seems incredibly deceptive.

To make such blatant changes and allow people to believe they are a “true “representation of that moment in time for me seems very wrong.

I found a really interesting article over at Photography Life about the importance of ethics in photography – it’s a very interesting read with some very good examples!!

My Ethics

As for my ethics I try to do as little as possible. I always shoot in RAW and I try to recreate, with the help of Lightroom, what I saw,  not what the camera captured in relation to colour and contrast.

I remove unwanted debris or rubbish and I always like to tidy up around the eyes – not a lot really!

I would love to know what you think – do you agree or disagree with photo manipulation and do you prefer my Fox 1 (before) or Fox 2 photo (after)?

Want to find out more ? Subscribe to WBN!

We will send you the latest information on Workshops, Hides and Wildlife Walkabouts straight to your inbox

This Post Has 2 Comments

  1. Karen

    I love and admire your unedited, natural photography (getting rid of the rubbish is def acceptable!). Nature wasn’t meant to be messed with and your photographs are amazing.
    So I disagree with photo manipulation and totally agree with your ethics. Don’t change what you do and please keep sharing
    Kind regards

    1. Wild By Nature

      Thanks Karen, thats really kind and very much appreciated – so glad you like the photos 🙂

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to find out more

Top Posts

Wild By Nature is proud to be a Qualified Member of the Guild of Photographers 

who are wild by nature

Jean Rolfe is the photographer behind WBN, she can often be found walking the South Downs with her four dogs or cycling around the narrow lanes of West Sussex, always looking for that next “wildlife” opportunity!

Learn more about WBN